mudimba's avatar

mudimba

Mike Dewey
409 Watchers229 Deviations
163.7K
Pageviews
My son...Conversations with my son  by mudimba
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In



I've enjoyed playing with cameras for many years now, but I have always been the type of photographer that just hopes that they run across something cool when they happen to have a camera on hand.  For a while now I have turned my nose at artificial lighting, but I've realized that I was really making a judgement based on the fact that on camera flashes generally ruin pictures.  If you take that same flash and move it away from your lens, it can free you from being a slave to the light that mother nature is providing at the moment.  So, I have got myself a speedlight, and I'm busy reading up on the very basics of how to paint with light.  Hold on to your hats and glasses folks, my gallery is about to get swamped with pictures of random junk from my kitchen as I play with my new gear at 1am.

Tonight I decided to play with two new concepts that I have been reading about.  The first is that the power of light has an inverse square falloff.  Imagine that you have a big beach ball that is centered on your light, and whose edge touches whatever you are photographing.  The light that falls on the object is basically the power of your flash divided by the surface area of the ball.  Why is this useful to know?  It basically says that the difference in lighting for objects that are 2 feet and 3 feet away from a flash is huge, where the difference when they are 20 feet and 21 feet away is much smaller.  The picture below was taken in my living room but nothing in the background is lit by the flash because it was only 2 feet away from the salt shakers.

The other thing that I have been reading about and decided to play with is how you should try to plan where your specular highlights fall.  I've always thought of lighting in terms of what shadows are cast and whatnot, but I guess that a lot of magic in photography can happen when you think of seeing the reflection of your light sources in objects.  Here I only had my one flash, but it was aimed at a blue book and a wooden bowl, so it is as if I have a white light, a blue light, and an orange one.

If any of you photographers out there have feedback or suggestions for what I should explore next, please let me know!  


Salt and Pepper by mudimba



Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
In the edit menu . . .




Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In


I spent pretty much all of today at the sculpture studio.  I started with a clay study for the next stone piece that I am going to carve.  The last time I made a clay study for stone work it got ruined by all the rock chips that fly around when I use a chisel.  So, this time around I decided to cast the clay into bronze so it can withstand the abuse.  This is my first foray into the art of mold making, so I am having an especially fun time with it.

When sunset comes and you are covered head to toe in clay, wax, and plaster, you know that it was a Sunday well spent.

Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In

On Boldness

5 min read


Recently I have been spending a lot of time learning to carve stone.  I always try to find creative outlets, but it has been a couple years since I have been this obsessed about art.  It is definitely refreshing to be back in that mode.

One thing that I have noticed is that a lot of my favorite two dimensional artists were/are great sculptors (and quite a few of them even carved stone).  Michelangelo, Leonardo, Degas, Picasso, Matisse, Kathe Kollwitz, Ernst Barlach, Giacometti, . . . the list goes on forever.  Given that a relatively small percentage of artists learn to sculpt, how is it that such a large number of the greats learned it?

I think that part of it has to be that when you are sculpting you are continually making mental drawings from all different angles.  When one looks at Michelangelo's penwork, they can easily see that his pen was following the contours that his chisel would have in a carving.  While everybody else was cross hatching at arbitrary angles, he was making his hatching find the surface that they described.

I am convinced, however, that a bigger reason is that sculpture (particularly subtractive sculpture) forces a person to be absolutely fearless when they approach their artwork.  One slip while carving stone and months worth of work are ruined.  Take a look at this page from my teacher's website: www.baldwinsculptor.com/html/t… to extenuating circumstances he had to carve the keystone of a central arch in situ!  Can you believe the pressure of carving a hand and portrait where a single mistake means that the whole building needs to be taken apart!

The higher that the stakes go, the more one has to proceed with utmost confidence.  When you only have one chance to make a line, you cannot risk having that line be timid and wobbly.  I think that people who are used to working under those conditions have that confidence spill over into the rest of their artwork, and ultimately into the rest of their life.

I don't think that sculpture is the only form of bold art.  Ink painting, some forms of street art, tattoo art, and many other mediums promote a gutsy attitude.  Anyway, the next time you find yourself reaching for that undo button or eraser, see what happens to your drawing if you just pretend like it isn't there.  Let me know if it ends up being better or worse.

Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Featured

Conversations with my son by mudimba, journal

Flipping in dA muro by mudimba, journal

Got to Say it Was a Good Day by mudimba, journal

On Boldness by mudimba, journal

Birthday by mudimba, journal